Iron Mountain: An Interesting High-Yield Stock Facing Several Risks
Iron Mountain's global diversification helps offset sluggish physical storage volumes in developed markets to keep overall document volume growth steady over time.
The firm's recurring cash flow also enjoys stability thanks to Iron Mountain's customer diversification, with no client representing more than 1% of revenue and its top 20 customers generating just 6% of sales.
While Iron Mountain's business spans records management, data protection, data management, digital solutions, shredding, data centers, and other adjacent businesses, the company's revenues remain focused on physical document storage in developed markets, where Iron Mountain has spent over 50 years expanding its logistics base.
In fact, over 60% of the REIT's revenue and just over 80% of its gross profits are derived from its storage rental business.
Prior to 2013, roughly 90% of Iron Mountain's business was in mature markets focused on document storage, with only 10% of sales generated from fast-growing segments. As you can see, management expects the firm's growth portfolio to account for 30% of revenue in 2020, driven by emerging markets and data centers.
Iron Mountain stores more than 700 million boxes of physical documents for its customers. Each of those boxes on average generates 25 cents per month and remains with the company for well over a decade, demonstrating the sticky and consistent nature of the business.
When combined with the low costs required to store boxes, Iron Mountain's storage operations, which generate over 80% of its gross profits, enjoy an EBITDA margin near 75%, in-line with most industrial REITs and far higher than regular US corporations.
A key to Iron Mountain's historical success is its industry-leading scale. For example, the REIT has arguably the most advanced and dense logistics network in many of its core developed markets. As a result it can more efficiently collect and transport customer documents to its storage centers than smaller rivals can.
When combined with the company's reputation for safety and reliability (sensitive documents are being stored or shredded), plus the cost and hassle associated with changing storage providers, Iron Mountain's clients face relatively high switching costs, which is why the REIT boasts a 98% customer retention rate.
Simply put, clients tend to store physical data and records with Iron Mountain for very long periods. For example, the company's average box age is 15 years, and 35% of its clients' boxes are have been in storage for 22 years or longer.
Going forward, the REIT plans to continue growing in this important market by continuing to consolidate the industry, which has over 700 million cubic feet of un-vended storage that needs to be served in North America alone. That's compared to Iron Mountain's 680 million cubic feet of North America storage capacity, meaning there seems to be a reasonably long growth runway in the company's most profitable market.
Iron Mountain has two key growth avenues it's pursuing. The first is international expansion, including in fast-growing emerging markets. Margins in many of these regions are actually higher due to lower construction and acquisition costs. These markets also enjoy a high single-digit organic growth rate, driven by their faster GDP growth and their earlier position in the storage outsourcing game.
Iron Mountain also plans to invest heavily in the coming years, nearly tripling its overall data center storage capacity organically. In 2019 alone the firm plans to spend $250 million to grow its data center business (for perspective, the firm's annual maintenance expenditures total around $150 million).
Management believes continued North American storage consolidation, emerging markets growth, and data center expansion will combine to drive double-digit EBITDA growth and about 4% annual dividend growth through 2020.
By the end of 2020, the REIT wants to hit a leverage ratio of 5.0 and eventually get that down to about 4.75. For now, however, the company's leverage profile is riskier than the average REIT's, earning Iron Mountain a junk credit rating of BB- from Standard & Poor's.
That being said, like all stocks, Iron Mountain has its fair share of challenges it will have to deal with in the coming years.
Although acquisitions still provide somewhat of a growth runway in developed markets, there is a limit to how much expansion can ultimately be achieved from this profitable core business, especially as more companies move to paperless (i.e. digital) documents.
In other words, Iron Mountain will likely have to depend even more on emerging markets, where its storage volumes continue to rise around 5% to 9% per year and have thus far more than offset the decline in developed markets.
However, eventually, the same switch away from paper might occur in these growth markets as well, putting increased pressure on management to deliver on its data center growth strategy.
The trouble is that Iron Mountain, while having decades-long relationships with the largest companies in the world, is still a relatively new player to data centers. This business competes against industry giants with far more scale and expertise such as Digital Realty Trust (DLR) and Equinix (EQIX). For example, Digital Realty has over 200 data centers compared to Iron Mountain's 13.
Those data center REITs enjoy much lower costs of capital, both due to their more premium stock valuations (higher price-to-cash flow multiples lower their cost of issuing equity) and investment grade credit ratings.
Meanwhile, Iron Mountain's junk bond credit rating means its borrowing costs are higher, raising its cost of capital and making profitable growth more difficult.
While the REIT does not have any meaningful debt maturing until 2023, approximately 31% of its debt has floating floating rates. In other words, Iron Mountain faces higher interest rate risk compared to its peers who mostly issue fixed-rate bonds.
This is one reason why management says deleveraging is a top priority. The REIT wants to minimize its long-term reliance on fickle and volatile equity markets to raise growth capital, while also minimizing the risk of having to refinance debt at potentially higher interest rates or during an economic downturn.
Between 2017 and 2019 management expects to issue 41 million new shares representing about 17% shareholder dilution. While almost all REITs naturally grow their share count over time (due to the requirement of paying out 90% of taxable income as dividends) this can create significant growth headwinds on a cash flow per share (AFFO per share) basis.
Iron Mountain's first-quarter 2019 earnings report saw the REIT reiterate its 2019 guidance, which calls for just 1 million new shares issued this year (less dilution) but also very modest AFFO per share growth of 2.6% (compared to 8.2% in 2018).
While the firm's AFFO payout ratio is expected to sit near 80%, a reasonably safe level in most cases, that only leaves around $95 million in retained cash flow to fund the REIT's growth plans in 2019, which total $625 million thanks largely to data center investments and acquisitions.
In other words, Iron Mountain is going to have to finance the majority of its growth spending with debt, which makes it harder to hit its long-term deleveraging goals.
In fact, between the third quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019 the REIT's leverage ratio rose from 5.6 to 5.8. While that's not a major increase, it is a step in the wrong direction, which is a concern if it continues.
If management runs into any challenges on execution, then Iron Mountain's dividend may not grow at 4% as planned, in order to lower the payout ratio more quickly and allow management to fund more growth with retained cash flow while minimizing further use of debt.
"We view an upgrade of IRM as unlikely given the company's dividend payout requirements, which reduce its financial flexibility and capital to fund its growth. Issuing equity to reduce its lease-adjusted leverage and demonstrating a commitment to sustaining leverage of comfortably below 5x is the most likely path to an upgrade. Alternatively, we could raise our rating if the company significantly increases the revenue and earnings contribution from its non-paper and tape storage businesses such that it improves our view of IRM's product mix or if it increases its owned real estate value to debt ratio."
The good news for Iron Mountain is that Standard & Poor's raised its adjusted debt to EBITDA leverage ratio threshold for a downgrade to 6.0 from the low-5.0 area. That gives management a little more breathing room as the firm executes on its growth plan, but the stakes are still high.
If its leverage keeps creeping up, perhaps due to growth investments that fail to deliver their expected returns, then Iron Mountain could find itself under greater pressure to protect its credit rating and keep its borrowing costs down.
Reducing the dividend would be one lever management could pull, but for now Iron Mountain seems far away from facing such a situation. Its investments and long-term diversification plan need more time to play out.
Specifically, data centers typically cost far more to purchase, meaning lower cash yields on acquired properties. For instance, Iron Mountain anticipates that it will be able to generate about 11.5% returns on capital from data centers compared to 12% to 14% for its physical storage business. Data center EBITDA margins are also just 50% compared to 70% to 75% in Iron Mountain's storage business.
Basically, the risk is that Iron Mountain will fail to achieve the scale and competitive advantages in data centers that it has in physical storage, dampening its long-term growth outlook (especially if the rise of digital documents starts weighing more on document storage demand its in most profitable developed markets).
While Iron Mountain has a solid core business that produces reliable cash flow, the REIT's sub-investment grade credit rating, high cost of capital, and lack of significant retained cash flow relative to its growth budget reduce its margin for error.
For example, due to its more limited financial flexibility, in 2019 Iron Mountain expects to fund 24% of its growth budget with property sales. However, should an economic downturn occur, impacting the prices Iron Mountain could fetch for its properties, then the firm's long-term growth plans could be disrupted.
Until the company has improved its leverage profile, conservative income investors may want to look elsewhere for yield, sticking with dividend payers which possess stronger balance sheets and better control over their long-term growth plans.
Should Iron Mountain make progress deleveraging its balance sheet and see its continued investments in emerging markets, adjacent business opportunities, and data centers bear fruit over the coming years, the company's profile should become more appealing for conservative income investors.
However, dividend investors need to make sure that management executes well, especially in continuing to generate steady cash flow from the firm's core storage business while balancing growth investments with deleveraging. Until Iron Mountain improves its financial flexibility, its margin for error remains lower than many other higher-quality REITs.
While Iron Mountain is not for everyone given its junk bond credit rating and evolving business model, it does appear to be one of the more interesting true high-yielding stocks for investors who are comfortable with its risk profile.